At risk: Minnesota’s 10,000 lakes

Right now, more than half of Minnesota’a streams and hundreds of acres of wetlands may be vulnerable to pollution and development. Polluters can dump garbage into streams, developers can pave over wetlands to build strip malls, and the cops on the environmental beat can’t do much about it. And it’s not just small streams and wetlands that will suffer — these waterways are the same ones that feed the more than 10,000 lakes in Minnesota and help to keep them clean.

Polluters poke holes in Clean Water Act

For nearly 40 years, the Clean Water Act has helped Minnesota — and states across the nation — care for and clean up our waterways. Thanks in large part to this law, rivers are no longer so polluted that they catch fire, as Ohio’s Cuyahoga infamously did in 1969. Still, much work remains to be done. Our report, “Wasting our Waterways” found that polluters dumped more than 2 million tons of toxic chemicals into Minnesota’s waterways in a single year. We need to do more to protect our lakes — not less. 

Unfortunately, over the past decade, polluters and irresponsible developers have used the courts to put Clean Water Act protections in legal limbo, arguing that the law doesn’t cover the smaller streams and wetlands that feed and clean our lakes. They want to throw out nearly 40 years of Clean Water Act protection, leaving polluting industries free to dump into our streams and pave over our wetlands without asking for permission.

The EPA can protect our lakes — but Congress threatens to stand in the way

Since 2008, we have been urging Congress to protect our lakes by simply declaring that the Clean Water Act applies to all of Minnesota’s — and America’s — waters. But, stymied at every turn by industry lobbyists and powerful special interests, we turned instead to the EPA for action. 

This spring, we and our allies across the country submitted more than 170,000 petitions to Administrator Lisa Jackson, urging her to restore protections to all of our waters. In April, she announced a plan to do just that. But Rep. Bachmann and polluters’ other allies in Congress won’t give up — and now they’re threatening to stop the EPA from doing its job. 

At the same time, powerful corporate interests are preparing for battle: ExxonMobil threatened “legal warfare” if the EPA moves forward with its plan to restore Clean Water Act protections. 

Our plan to defend Minnesota’s lakes 

We refuse to let Rep. Bachmann open our precious waterways to more dumping and development. We’re bringing together Minnesotans from all walks of life to protect our lakes. From anglers to swimmers, clergy to scientists, local officials to ordinary families, we all have a stake in keeping our water clean. 

Our citizen outreach staff has been knocking on doors across the state, educating Minnesotans about what’s at stake. Whether we head up north for a weekend, or stay near home to swim and fish, Minnesota’s lakes are a big reason our state is such a great place to live and visit. But if we’re going to push past ExxonMobil and other powerful polluters, we’re going to need everyone who cares about Minnesota’s Lakes to get involved. Join our campaign by sending the EPA a message today.

Join our campaign by sending a message to the EPA right now.

Clean water issue updates

Headline

Quest for data slows copper-nickel mine near Hoyt Lakes

Environmentalists say that northeastern Minnesota, with forests, lakes and wetlands that make it one of the most beautiful and popular areas in the state, is the wrong place for such a mine. The risk of acid runoff and the leaching of heavy metals, they argue, are too great a risk. They also say it could threaten some of the declining number of Minnesota's naturally occurring stands of wild rice, a major concern for Indian tribes, because the plant does not grow well in water high in sulfates, another potential byproduct of the mine and ore processing.

> Keep Reading
News Release | Environment Minnesota Research and Policy Center

Nuclear Power Plants Threaten Drinking Water for 935,100 Minnesotans

The drinking water for 935,100 people in Minnesota could be at risk of radioactive contamination from a leak or accident at a local nuclear power plant, says a new study released today by Environment Minnesota Research & Policy Center and the Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (MPIRG).

> Keep Reading
Report | Environment Minnesota Research and Policy Center

Too Close to Home

Leakage of radioactive material into groundwater is a common occurrence at U.S. nuclear power plants.  Because of the inherent risks of nuclear power, the United States should ensure that all currently operating nuclear power plants are, at the latest, retired at the end of their operating licenses and the nation should move toward cleaner, safer solutions such as energy efficiency and renewable energy for our future energy needs.

> Keep Reading
Headline

Xcel says there's no risk as Prairie Island spills radioactive water again

Radioactive water has spilled from Xcel Energy's Prairie Island nuclear power plant near Red Wing, Minn., on two recent occasions, according to notifications the utility sent to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this month.

> Keep Reading
Headline

More Minnesota lakes, rivers added to impaired list

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is adding another 500 lakes and stretches of river to its list of impaired waters.
This new list brings the total number of impaired rivers and lakes to more than 3,600.

> Keep Reading

Pages

View AllRSS Feed